Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 277 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled has 81% more |
| Protein | 24.98 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled has 2% more |
| Fat | 19.64 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled has 272% more |
| Sodium | 71 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled has 100% more |
| Iron | 2.45 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, grilled has 444% more |
| Potassium | 325 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.