Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 227 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 48% more |
| Protein | 18.86 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
| Fat | 16.85 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 219% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 75% more |
| Iron | 2.1 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 367% more |
| Potassium | 330 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.