Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 41% more |
| Protein | 18.86 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
| Fat | 15.6 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 195% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 24% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 75% more |
| Iron | 2.14 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 376% more |
| Potassium | 342 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 22% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.