Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 153 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Equal |
| Protein | 21.29 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Fat | 7.56 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 43% more |
| Sodium | 70 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 22% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 88% more |
| Iron | 2.28 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 407% more |
| Potassium | 371 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.