Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 41% more |
| Protein | 27.97 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 14% more |
| Fat | 11.47 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 117% more |
| Sodium | 75 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 17% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 100% more |
| Iron | 2.88 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, grilled has 540% more |
| Potassium | 391 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 11% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.