Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 199 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 30% more |
| Protein | 27.88 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 13% more |
| Fat | 9.77 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 85% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
| Calcium | 19 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 138% more |
| Iron | 2.81 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck eye steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, grilled has 524% more |
| Potassium | 356 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.