Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 9% more |
| Protein | 21.19 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 382% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.18 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 170% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 1071% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 2.5 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 68% more |
| Potassium | 347 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 102% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.