Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 122 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 2% more |
| Protein | 21.05 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 378% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 119% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 986% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 2.25 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 51% more |
| Potassium | 341 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 98% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.