Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 117 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 3% more |
| Protein | 21.22 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 382% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.53 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 84% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 986% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 35% more |
| Iron | 2.26 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 52% more |
| Potassium | 344 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.