Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Nuts, almonds
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Nuts, almonds
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Nuts, almonds | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 160 kcal ★ | 579 kcal | Nuts, almonds has 72% more |
| Protein | 25.87 g ★ | 21.15 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 22% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.55 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Fat | 5.52 g ★ | 49.93 g | Nuts, almonds has 89% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 12.5 g ★ | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 4.35 g | Nuts, almonds has 100% more |
| Sodium | 71 mg | 1 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 7000% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 269 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 97% more |
| Iron | 2.93 mg | 3.71 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 21% more |
| Potassium | 293 mg | 733 mg ★ | Nuts, almonds has 60% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.