Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Quinoa, cooked

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
Nutrient Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled Quinoa, cooked Difference
Calories 160 kcal 120 kcal Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 33% more
Protein 25.87 g 4.4 g Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 488% more
Carbs 0 g 21.3 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Fat 5.52 g 1.92 g Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 188% more
Fiber 0 g 2.8 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 0.87 g Quinoa, cooked has 100% more
Sodium 71 mg 7 mg Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 914% more
Calcium 8 mg 17 mg Quinoa, cooked has 53% more
Iron 2.93 mg 1.49 mg Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 97% more
Potassium 293 mg 172 mg Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 70% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.