Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 184 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 104% more |
| Protein | 26.16 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 1201% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 5233% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 89% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 2.8 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 306% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 304 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.