Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 222 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 85% more |
| Protein | 30.91 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 603% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 10.91 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 468% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 829% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Iron | 3.25 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 118% more |
| Potassium | 312 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 81% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.