Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 79% more |
| Protein | 32.01 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 628% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 9.66 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 403% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 843% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Iron | 3.15 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 111% more |
| Potassium | 303 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 76% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.