Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 187 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 108% more |
| Protein | 27.42 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 1264% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.72 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 5047% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 36 mg ★ | 36 mg | Equal |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 2.24 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, round, bottom round, roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 225% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 223 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 53% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.