Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 179 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked has 99% more |
| Protein | 25.45 g ★ | 2.01 g | Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked has 1166% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 8.62 g | 0.15 g ★ | Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked has 5647% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 36 mg ★ | Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked has 111% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 3.19 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked has 362% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 353 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.