Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
Nutrient Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 143 kcal 90 kcal Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) has 59% more
Protein 29.45 g 2.01 g Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) has 1365% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 2.8 g 0.15 g Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) has 1767% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 56 mg 36 mg Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) has 56% more
Calcium 5 mg 38 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more
Iron 9.06 mg 0.69 mg Elk, free range, ground, cooked patties (Shoshone Bannock) has 1213% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 379 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.