Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock)
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Protein | 20.14 g ★ | 4.4 g | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 358% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.8 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 6% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 49 mg | 7 mg ★ | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 600% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 76% more |
| Iron | 7.17 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 381% more |
| Potassium | 328 mg ★ | 172 mg | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 91% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.