Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock)
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 8% more |
| Protein | 20.14 g ★ | 2.01 g | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 902% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 1100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 49 mg | 36 mg ★ | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 36% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 7.17 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Elk, free range, ground, raw (Shoshone Bannock) has 939% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 328 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.