Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled
6 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
1 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 154 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 7% more |
| Protein | 31.27 g ★ | 31.02 g | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 1% more |
| Fat | 2.3 g ★ | 3.57 g | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 36% more |
| Sodium | 53 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 28% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 60% more |
| Iron | 4.56 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 338% more |
| Potassium | 397 mg ★ | 256 mg | Emu, fan fillet, cooked, broiled has 55% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.