Fish, blackfish, whole (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, blackfish, whole (Alaska Native)
7 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
3 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, blackfish, whole (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 82 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 32% more |
| Protein | 15.5 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, blackfish, whole (Alaska Native) has 252% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.75 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 9% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 0 mg ★ | 7 mg | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Calcium | 236 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, blackfish, whole (Alaska Native) has 1288% more |
| Iron | 4.6 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, blackfish, whole (Alaska Native) has 209% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.