Fish, cisco, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, cisco, raw
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, cisco, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 98 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, cisco, raw has 9% more |
| Protein | 18.99 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, cisco, raw has 845% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.91 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, cisco, raw has 1173% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 55 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, cisco, raw has 53% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.4 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 354 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.