Fish, rockfish, Pacific, mixed species, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, rockfish, Pacific, mixed species, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, rockfish, Pacific, mixed species, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 90 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 25% more |
| Protein | 18.36 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, rockfish, Pacific, mixed species, raw has 317% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.34 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 30% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, rockfish, Pacific, mixed species, raw has 957% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 18% more |
| Iron | 0.3 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 80% more |
| Potassium | 386 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, rockfish, Pacific, mixed species, raw has 124% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.