Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 119 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 1% more |
| Protein | 21.49 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 388% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.97 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 55% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 51 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 629% more |
| Calcium | 90 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 429% more |
| Iron | 1.67 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 12% more |
| Potassium | 487 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 183% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.