Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 119 kcal 90 kcal Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 32% more
Protein 21.49 g 2.01 g Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 969% more
Carbs 0 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Fat 2.97 g 0.15 g Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 1880% more
Fiber 0 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sugar 0 g 6.48 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Sodium 51 mg 36 mg Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 42% more
Calcium 90 mg 38 mg Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 137% more
Iron 1.67 mg 0.69 mg Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 142% more
Vitamin C 0 mg 19.6 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more
Potassium 487 mg 475 mg Fish, sucker, white, cooked, dry heat has 3% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.