Fish, sucker, white, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, sucker, white, raw
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
5 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, sucker, white, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 92 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 23% more |
| Protein | 16.76 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 281% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.32 g | 1.92 g ★ | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 21% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 40 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 471% more |
| Calcium | 70 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 312% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 13% more |
| Potassium | 380 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 121% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.