Fish, sucker, white, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, sucker, white, raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, sucker, white, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 92 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 2% more |
| Protein | 16.76 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 734% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.32 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 1447% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 40 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 11% more |
| Calcium | 70 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 84% more |
| Iron | 1.3 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, sucker, white, raw has 88% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 380 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.