Juice, apple and grape blend, with added ascorbic acid vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Juice, apple and grape blend, with added ascorbic acid
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Juice, apple and grape blend, with added ascorbic acid | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 50 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
| Protein | 0.16 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Carbs | 12.46 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 40% more |
| Fat | 0.12 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Fiber | 0.2 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sugar | 10.92 g | 6.48 g ★ | Juice, apple and grape blend, with added ascorbic acid has 69% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Iron | 0.11 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Vitamin C | 28.2 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Juice, apple and grape blend, with added ascorbic acid has 44% more |
| Potassium | 96 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.