Juice, apple, grape and pear blend, with added ascorbic acid and calcium vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt

Nutrition comparison per 100g

🏆
Juice, apple, grape and pear blend, with added ascorbic acid and calcium
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
Nutrient Juice, apple, grape and pear blend, with added ascorbic acid and calcium Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt Difference
Calories 52 kcal 90 kcal Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more
Protein 0.17 g 2.01 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more
Carbs 12.96 g 20.71 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more
Fat 0.12 g 0.15 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more
Fiber 0.2 g 3.3 g Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more
Sugar 9.95 g 6.48 g Juice, apple, grape and pear blend, with added ascorbic acid and calcium has 54% more
Sodium 5 mg 36 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 86% more
Calcium 72 mg 38 mg Juice, apple, grape and pear blend, with added ascorbic acid and calcium has 89% more
Iron 0.14 mg 0.69 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more
Vitamin C 50.7 mg 19.6 mg Juice, apple, grape and pear blend, with added ascorbic acid and calcium has 159% more
Potassium 89 mg 475 mg Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more

Compare Food Groups

Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.