Ostrich, inside leg, cooked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ostrich, inside leg, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 141 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked has 18% more |
| Protein | 29.01 g ★ | 4.4 g | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked has 559% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 1.94 g | 1.92 g ★ | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked has 1% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 83 mg | 7 mg ★ | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked has 1086% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 3.12 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked has 109% more |
| Potassium | 352 mg ★ | 172 mg | Ostrich, inside leg, cooked has 105% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.