SILK French Vanilla Creamer vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK French Vanilla Creamer
0 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
11 wins
| Nutrient | SILK French Vanilla Creamer | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 133 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | SILK French Vanilla Creamer has 48% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 20 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Fat | 6.67 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK French Vanilla Creamer has 4347% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 20 g | 6.48 g ★ | SILK French Vanilla Creamer has 209% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 36 mg ★ | SILK French Vanilla Creamer has 86% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.