SILK Light Plain, soymilk vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Light Plain, soymilk
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Light Plain, soymilk | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 29 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Protein | 2.47 g ★ | 2.01 g | SILK Light Plain, soymilk has 23% more |
| Carbs | 3.29 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Fat | 0.82 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK Light Plain, soymilk has 447% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sugar | 2.47 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 62% more |
| Sodium | 49 mg | 36 mg ★ | SILK Light Plain, soymilk has 36% more |
| Calcium | 123 mg ★ | 38 mg | SILK Light Plain, soymilk has 224% more |
| Iron | 0.44 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 123 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.