Tamarind nectar, canned vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tamarind nectar, canned
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Tamarind nectar, canned | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 57 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 53% more |
| Protein | 0.09 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 98% more |
| Carbs | 14.73 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 31% more |
| Fat | 0.12 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 94% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 82% more |
| Sugar | 12.7 g | 0.87 g ★ | Tamarind nectar, canned has 1360% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 7 mg | Equal |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 41% more |
| Iron | 0.75 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 50% more |
| Vitamin C | 7.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Tamarind nectar, canned has 0% more |
| Potassium | 27 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 84% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.