Tamarind nectar, canned vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tamarind nectar, canned
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Tamarind nectar, canned | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 57 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 37% more |
| Protein | 0.09 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Carbs | 14.73 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
| Fat | 0.12 g ★ | 0.15 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 20% more |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 85% more |
| Sugar | 12.7 g | 6.48 g ★ | Tamarind nectar, canned has 96% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 0.75 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Tamarind nectar, canned has 9% more |
| Vitamin C | 7.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Potassium | 27 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.