Tea, tundra, herb and laborador combination (Alaska Native) vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Tea, tundra, herb and laborador combination (Alaska Native)
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Tea, tundra, herb and laborador combination (Alaska Native) | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 1 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 99% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Carbs | 0.2 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 99% more |
| Fat | 0 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 132 mg | 7 mg ★ | Tea, tundra, herb and laborador combination (Alaska Native) has 1786% more |
| Calcium | 2 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 88% more |
| Iron | 0.08 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
| Vitamin C | 0.3 mg ★ | 0 mg | Tea, tundra, herb and laborador combination (Alaska Native) has 0% more |
| Potassium | 9 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 95% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.