Acerola, (west indian cherry), raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Acerola, (west indian cherry), raw
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Acerola, (west indian cherry), raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 32 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 80% more |
| Carbs | 7.69 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.15 g ★ | Acerola, (west indian cherry), raw has 100% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 7 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 81% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Iron | 0.2 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 71% more |
| Vitamin C | 1677.6 mg ★ | 19.6 mg | Acerola, (west indian cherry), raw has 8459% more |
| Potassium | 146 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 69% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.