Babyfood, meat, beef, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, meat, beef, strained
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, meat, beef, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 81 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Protein | 12.03 g ★ | 2.01 g | Babyfood, meat, beef, strained has 499% more |
| Carbs | 2.43 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Fat | 2.52 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, meat, beef, strained has 1580% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 41 mg | 36 mg ★ | Babyfood, meat, beef, strained has 14% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 0.98 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Babyfood, meat, beef, strained has 42% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 187 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.