Babyfood, meat, ham, strained vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, meat, ham, strained
5 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 19% more |
| Protein | 11.3 g ★ | 4.4 g | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 157% more |
| Carbs | 3.7 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 83% more |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 1.92 g ★ | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 98% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 44 mg | 7 mg ★ | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 529% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 1.03 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 31% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.1 mg ★ | 0 mg | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 0% more |
| Potassium | 204 mg ★ | 172 mg | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 19% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.