Babyfood, meat, ham, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, meat, ham, strained
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 97 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 8% more |
| Protein | 11.3 g ★ | 2.01 g | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 462% more |
| Carbs | 3.7 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 2433% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 44 mg | 36 mg ★ | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 22% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 1.03 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Babyfood, meat, ham, strained has 49% more |
| Vitamin C | 2.1 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Potassium | 204 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 57% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.