Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 94 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained has 4% more |
| Protein | 14.07 g ★ | 2.01 g | Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained has 600% more |
| Carbs | 0.85 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 96% more |
| Fat | 3.41 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained has 2173% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 43 mg | 36 mg ★ | Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained has 19% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 1.19 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Babyfood, meat, lamb, strained has 72% more |
| Vitamin C | 1.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Potassium | 193 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 59% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.