Babyfood, meat, veal, strained vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Babyfood, meat, veal, strained
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | Babyfood, meat, veal, strained | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 81 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 10% more |
| Protein | 13.12 g ★ | 2.01 g | Babyfood, meat, veal, strained has 553% more |
| Carbs | 1.51 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 93% more |
| Fat | 2.45 g | 0.15 g ★ | Babyfood, meat, veal, strained has 1533% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg | 36 mg ★ | Babyfood, meat, veal, strained has 8% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 0.76 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Babyfood, meat, veal, strained has 10% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 170 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.