Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 217 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 81% more |
| Protein | 26.11 g ★ | 4.4 g | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 493% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 11.65 g | 1.92 g ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 507% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 68 mg | 7 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 871% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 2.81 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 89% more |
| Potassium | 304 mg ★ | 172 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.