Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 230 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked has 39% more |
| Protein | 28.4 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 8% more |
| Fat | 12.42 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked has 248% more |
| Sodium | 62 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 7% more |
| Iron | 2.82 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked has 171% more |
| Potassium | 323 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked has 26% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.