Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 167 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 9% more |
| Protein | 20.95 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 15% more |
| Fat | 9.3 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 76% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 32% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 63% more |
| Iron | 2.04 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 353% more |
| Potassium | 310 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.