Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 203 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 23% more |
| Protein | 28.61 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 8% more |
| Fat | 9.18 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 157% more |
| Sodium | 62 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg ★ | 15 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 2.69 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 159% more |
| Potassium | 333 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.