Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 157 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 3% more |
| Protein | 21.2 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Fat | 8 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 52% more |
| Sodium | 61 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 32% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 63% more |
| Iron | 2.06 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 358% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.