Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked has 69% more |
| Protein | 26.11 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked has 6% more |
| Fat | 16.59 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked has 214% more |
| Sodium | 50 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 44% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked has 63% more |
| Iron | 2.2 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, cooked has 389% more |
| Potassium | 271 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.