Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 138 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 10% more |
| Protein | 22.15 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 10% more |
| Fat | 5.54 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 5% more |
| Sodium | 60 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
| Calcium | 13 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 63% more |
| Iron | 2.08 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 362% more |
| Potassium | 322 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.