Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 206 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked has 35% more |
| Protein | 29.51 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked has 20% more |
| Fat | 8.87 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked has 68% more |
| Sodium | 63 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 30% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked has 75% more |
| Iron | 2.98 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked has 562% more |
| Potassium | 338 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.