Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 151 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 8% more |
| Protein | 21.55 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
| Fat | 7.24 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 103% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 11% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 7% more |
| Iron | 2.16 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 108% more |
| Potassium | 335 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.